S.D. New York· 2/1/1982
Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank
Citations
- 93 F.R.D. 471
- 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,557
- 8 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1155
- 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 346
- 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10865
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that while litigants have a “broad right of access to information” in order to “avoid potential abuse of this broad right . . . the rules invest the trial court with discretionary authority to control the discovery process”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goettel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, IntervenorFirst Circuit· 1986-11-05· cited 252×
- Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1982-12-13· cited 92×
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.S.D. New York· 1996-04-02· cited 72×
- Avirgan v. HullDistrict of Columbia· 1987-12-09· cited 64×
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-03-30· cited 55×
- Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. SlavinTennessee Supreme Court· 2004-08-27· cited 53×
- Reed v. BennettD. Kansas· 2000-05-02· cited 47×
- Horizon Holdings, L.L.C. v. Genmar Holdings, Inc.D. Kansas· 2002-05-30· cited 42×
- Gordon v. Target Corp.E.D. New York· 2016-12-05· cited 39×
- Moskowitz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-11-09· cited 36×
- Wauchop v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 1991-08-06· cited 26×
- Hasbrouck v. BankAmerica Housing ServicesN.D. New York· 1999-08-04· cited 25×
- Koster v. Chase Manhattan BankS.D. New York· 1983-01-07· cited 21×
- Farley v. FarleyM.D. Tennessee· 1997-02-14· cited 16×
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group Inc.D. New Jersey· 1985-07-17· cited 16×
- Zapata v. IBP, Inc.D. Kansas· 1995-03-05· cited 14×
- Johnson v. Olathe District SchoolsD. Kansas· 2003-01-28· cited 8×
- United States v. DorfmanN.D. Illinois· 1982-09-07· cited 7×
- DaCosta v. City of DanburyD. Connecticut· 2014-03-03· cited 5×
- In Re Texaco Inc.S.D. New York· 1988-03-11· cited 3×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 4,546×
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 1,951×
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 1,758×
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court· 1931-06-01· cited 1,633×
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court· 1958-06-02· cited 1,365×
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 973×
- United States v. CridenThird Circuit· 1981-04-20· cited 246×
- In Re Application of National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Applicants- United States of America v. Michael O. MyersSecond Circuit· 1980-10-01· cited 170×
- In Re Adele HalkinD.C. Circuit· 1979-01-31· cited 151×
- Chicago Council of Lawyers v. William J. Bauer, and Terence MacCarthy Intervenors-AppelleesSeventh Circuit· 1975-08-04· cited 145×
- United States v. MitchellD.C. Circuit· 1976-10-26· cited 98×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1981-10-26· cited 90×
- International Products Corp. v. KoonsSecond Circuit· 1963-10-28· cited 87×
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.S.D. New York· 1975-05-02· cited 75×
- Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.Third Circuit· 1976-06-03· cited 51×
- National Polymer Products, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationSixth Circuit· 1981-02-11· cited 49×
- Reliance Insurance v. Barron'sS.D. New York· 1977-03-16· cited 41×
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.W.D. New York· 1981-06-09· cited 34×
Other cases named Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.