District of Columbia· 12/9/1987
Avirgan v. Hull
Citations
- 118 F.R.D. 252
- 9 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1086
- 14 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2136
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11659
- 1987 WL 25220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remarking that the court’s focus is on whether the movant shows good cause
- denying a Rule 26(c) motion for a protective order which would have prohibited the press from attending a deposition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, P.A. v. The Prudential Insurance CompanyThird Circuit· 1991-10-10· cited 217×
- Angelo Fears v. John KasichSixth Circuit· 2016-12-30· cited 129×
- Nix v. SwordSixth Circuit· 2001-05-24· cited 111×
- Jennings v. Family ManagementDistrict of Columbia· 2001-07-16· cited 38×
- Wauchop v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 1991-08-06· cited 26×
- Huthnance v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2008-12-15· cited 21×
- United States v. One Gulfstream G-V Jet Aircraft Displaying Tail Number VPCESDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-09· cited 19×
- In re Skelaxin (Metaxalone) Antitrust LitigationE.D. Tennessee· 2013-06-10· cited 18×
- Herald Ass'n v. Judicial Conduct BoardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-22· cited 14×
- Pritchett v. DerwinskiVeterans Claims· 1992-01-31· cited 10×
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District of Columbia· 2007-12-03· cited 9×
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District of Columbia· 2002-02-24· cited 7×
- Federal Election Commission v. Gopac, Inc.District of Columbia· 1995-09-06· cited 6×
- Stam v. DerwinskiVeterans Claims· 1991-06-20· cited 6×
- In re Northshore University HealthsystemN.D. Illinois· 2008-11-26· cited 5×
- Kimberlin v. QuinlanDistrict of Columbia· 1992-10-01· cited 5×
- McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2004-01-21· cited 4×
- In Re Texaco Inc.S.D. New York· 1988-03-11· cited 3×
- CONTINENTAL TRANSFERT TECHNIQUE LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA Et Al., DefendantsDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-28· cited 3×
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 1998-06-15· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 1,798×
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, IntervenorFirst Circuit· 1986-11-05· cited 252×
- In Re Adele HalkinD.C. Circuit· 1979-01-31· cited 151×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1981-10-26· cited 90×
- Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyFirst Circuit· 1961-05-05· cited 65×
- Koster v. Chase Manhattan BankS.D. New York· 1982-02-01· cited 31×
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group Inc.D. New Jersey· 1985-07-17· cited 16×
- Avirgan v. HullDistrict of Columbia· 1987-07-31· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.