M.D. Tennessee· 2/14/1997
Farley v. Farley
Citations
- 952 F. Supp. 1232
- 46 Fed. R. Serv. 689
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1691
- 1997 WL 73204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “redaction of identifying information is a proper and sufficient means of furthering the public policy of Tennessee by protecting the anonymity of those who report child abuse”
- modifying protective order to broaden disclosure of plaintiff’s already-produced DCS case file in action alleging that plaintiff’s husband conspired with DCS to remove children from plaintiff’s custody
- \This Court has little difficulty in concluding the T.C.A. SS 37-1-409 and 37-1-612 establish an evidentiary privilege that is entitled to deference under the principles of federalism and comity that are an implicit component of Rule 501.\
- “In federal civil rights actions, most courts that have taken up the issue of state privileges have concluded that state law must yield to the federal interest in full disclosure of all facts bearing upon the denial of federally-guaranteed rights.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2000-04-26· cited 175×
- John B. v. GoetzM.D. Tennessee· 2010-01-28· cited 22×
- Lopez v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleM.D. Tennessee· 2009-07-07· cited 17×
- Freed v. Grand Court Lifestyles, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 1998-12-21· cited 7×
- Deleon v. Putnam Valley Board of EducationS.D. New York· 2005-05-10· cited 7×
- Seales v. Macomb CountyE.D. Michigan· 2005-03-22· cited 4×
- R.K. v. KanaskiS.D. Florida· 2006-03-24
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 1,914×
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 1,798×
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 1,217×
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court· 1965-10-11· cited 827×
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesTenth Circuit· 1988-05-31· cited 591×
- Kelly v. City of San JoseN.D. California· 1987-02-26· cited 228×
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoE.D. Pennsylvania· 1973-03-13· cited 184×
- Cbs Inc. v. The Honorable Don J. Young, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of OhioSixth Circuit· 1975-08-14· cited 153×
- King v. CondeE.D. New York· 1988-06-15· cited 146×
- Whittington v. MilbySixth Circuit· 1991-03-14· cited 138×
- American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Cliff Finch, Governor of the State of MississippiFifth Circuit· 1981-03-13· cited 124×
- Lora v. Board of EducationE.D. New York· 1977-05-12· cited 104×
- Nguyen Da Yen, Cross-Appellees v. Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State, Cross-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1975-11-05· cited 78×
- Bulow v. BulowSecond Circuit· 1987-04-20· cited 71×
- National Polymer Products, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationSixth Circuit· 1981-02-11· cited 49×
- Burke v. New York City Police DepartmentS.D. New York· 1987-03-26· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.