Skip to main content
· 12/5/2016

Gordon v. Target Corp.

Citations

  • 318 F.R.D. 242
  • 2016 WL 7048702
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying Rule 16(c) motion to resolve key issues of law because it implicated factual questions, and thereby were more properly resolved through summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tomlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.