Skip to main content
D. Kansas· 5/2/2000

Reed v. Bennett

Citations

  • 193 F.R.D. 689
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8044
  • 2000 WL 744019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that to establish good cause, the moving party must show “that disclosure of the information will result in a ‘clearly defined and serious injury’” (internal citation omitted)
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”
  • “An overbroad Rule 30(b)(6) notice subjects the noticed party to an impossible task.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murguia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.