Kleehammer v. Monroe County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Iqbal left only the first and part of the third methods under Colon intact
• holding that “[o]nly the first and part of the third Colon categories pass Iqbal’s muster. . . .”
• stating that “some courts and commentators have concluded that Twombly and Iqbal repudiated Swierkiewicz, at least to the extent that Swierkiewicz relied upon pre-Twombly pleading standards”
• “[C}onclusory allegations . . . need not be accepted as true for purposes of ruling on a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).