Skip to main content
· 10/26/2010

Mayale-Eke v. Merrill Lynch

Citations

  • 754 F. Supp. 2d 372
  • 2010 WL 4242898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is \unrealistic to think that in the 21st century any sophisticated\ person would make a blatant statement tainted with impermissible discriminatory animus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William E. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.