Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/16/2005

King v. King

Citations

889 A.2d 630
2005 Pa. Super. 420
2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that, if the certified record supports a trial court’s conclusions in a custody matter, the trial court is not required to accept an expert’s conclusions and recommendations
explaining that when reviewing the trial court’s decision for an abuse of discretion, “[i]t is not -9- J-S29001-25 this Court’s function to determine whether the trial court reached the ‘right’ decision” (citation omitted)
in child custody matter, we may not alter trial court’s conclusions “provided they are supported by the record or unless they are manifestly unreasonable.”
this Court gives due deference to trial court’s weight and credibility determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Panella, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named King v. King

334 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.