DiMarco v. DiMarco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating an appellate court will affirm the decision of the family court unless the decision is controlled by an error of law or the appellant satisfies the burden of showing the preponderance of the evidence actually supports contrary factual findings by the appellate court
• \[T]his broad standard of review does not require the appellate court to disregard the factual findings of the [family] court or ignore the fact that the [family] court is in the better position to assess the credibility of the witnesses.\
• remanding \to the family court for reconsideration of attorney's fees\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Doe v. South Carolina Department of Social Services
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-04-30· cited 4×
• Fredrickson v. Schulze
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-04-13· cited 4×
• Burgess v. Burgess
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-01-15· cited 3×
• Conits v. Conits
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-16· cited 3×
• Couch v. Couch
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-07-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lewis v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 337×
• First Savings Bank v. McLean
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-23· cited 206×
• Pinckney v. Warren
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 88×
• Sexton v. Sexton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 46×
• King v. King
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-16· cited 42×
• Shealy v. Doe
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-26· cited 20×