Skip to main content

King v. King

Citations

  • 578 S.E.2d 806
  • 40 Va. App. 200
  • 2003 Va. App. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the agreement specifically defined “separate” and specifically defined future income as separate property
  • noting the agreement specifically defined “separate” and specifically defined future income as separate property
  • “It is generally recognized that the opinion testimony of the owner of property . . . is competent and admissible on the question of the value of such property, regardless of his knowledge of property values.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.