King v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen parties dispute the meaning of the [postnuptial] agreement, ‘the court must interpret it according to principles of contract law and the court’s statutory responsibilities.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Webster v. Hope (In Re Hope)
  District of Columbia· 1999-03-03· cited 27×
• Link v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-01· cited 25×
• Ealey v. Ealey
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-14· cited 17×
• Ginberg v. Tauber
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-04-25· cited 15×
• Fleming v. Carroll Publishing Co.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-26· cited 15×
• McDiarmid v. McDiarmid
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-10-24· cited 15×
• Jung v. Jung
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-02-07· cited 11×
• Hundley v. Johnston
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-04-28· cited 6×
• Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local No. 2 v. International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-09-14· cited 6×
• Fritz v. Grise
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-05-02· cited 2×
• Taylor v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-10-03
• Blount v. Squire Padgett
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-10-14
• Simon v. Smith
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-04-21

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kotteakos v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
• Synanon Foundation, Inc. v. Bernstein
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-11-04· cited 53×
• Alves v. Alves
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1970-02-17· cited 49×
• Stansel v. American Security Bank
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-09-23· cited 45×
• Ritz v. Ritz
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1964-02-05· cited 39×
• Steadman v. Steadman
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-22· cited 35×
• Montgomery v. Jimmy's Tire & Auto Center, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-29· cited 34×
• Darling v. Darling
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-03-25· cited 27×
• Rachal v. Rachal
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-21· cited 22×
• Clark v. Clark
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-12-31· cited 22×
• Spencer v. Spencer
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-06-26· cited 20×
• General Federation of Women's Clubs v. Iron Gate Inn, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-02-18· cited 19×
• Tydings v. Tydings
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-12-13· cited 17×
• District of Columbia v. Hunt
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-04-27· cited 12×
• Redding v. CAPITOL CAB COMPANY
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-11-30· cited 12×
• Smith v. Smith
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-05-24· cited 5×
• Kelly v. Clyburn
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-29· cited 4×