King v. King
Citations
- 36 Pa. Super. 33
- 1908 Pa. Super. LEXIS 106
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Desertion—Separation—Intent.</p> <p>Desertion is an actual abandonment of matrimonial cohabitation, with intent to desert willfully and maliciously persisted in without cause for two years. The guilty intent is manifested when, without cause or consent, either party withdraws from the residence of the other. The guilty intent to desert is rebutted where the separation is encouraged by the other party, or is by mutual consent.</p> <p>Mutual consent to the separation, not revoked by either party, is as fatal to an application for divorce upon the ground of desertion, as would be acts on the part of the libelant which would give the respondent legal cause to leave him, and to obtain a divorce from him.</p> <p>What may have been desertion in its inception, but has become a separation with mutual consent within two years, is not ground for divorce.</p> <p>The mutual consent that will prevent a divorce upon the ground of desertion may be inferred from the conduct of the parties, and need not be put in the form of a solemn written agreement.</p> <p>Divorce — Findings of fact — Review by the appellate .court — Evidence— Appeal.</p> <p>In reviewing the evidence brought up on an appeal from a decree refusing a divorce after trial in open court by a judge, where the evidence is in irreconcilable conflict, and the correct determination of the issues-of fact depends upon a determination of the veracity of witnesses who have given opposing testimony, the appellate court will, amongst other things, consider and give weight to the fact that the judge who saw and heard the witnesses and observed their manner of testifying had a much better opportunity than the appellate court to form a correct judgment as to their credibility.</p> <p>Desertion — Alimony—Counsel fee.</p> <p>The court in entering a decree refusing a divorce, may at the same time make absolute a rule on the libelant, the husband, to pay the respondent, the wife, reasonable alimony pendente' lite and counse
Judges: Beaver, Heaü, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neagley v. NeagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-04-19· cited 31×
- Coxe v. CoxeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 15×
- Pearce v. PearceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-02-27· cited 14×
- Naylor v. NaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-05-24· cited 14×
- Pomerantz v. PomerantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-03-03· cited 14×
- Kelly v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-10-14· cited 12×
- Thompson v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-05-13· cited 10×
- Kurniker v. KurnikerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-07-16· cited 6×
- Hagman v. HagmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-02-26· cited 2×
- Saville v. SavilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-04-18· cited 2×
- Baumhauer v. BaumhauerPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1942-03-31· cited 1×
- Smith v. SmithSchuylkill County Court of Common Pleas· 1924-02-11
- Chesebrough v. ChesebroughSchuylkill County Court of Common Pleas· 1925-11-02
- Collins v. CollinsPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1931-01-31
- Bonomo v. BonomoLuzerne County Court of Common Pleas· 1935-05-23
- Hyde v. HydeCrawford County Court of Common Pleas· 1924-11-03
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-10-17· cited 90×
- Ingersoll v. IngersollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1865-07-01· cited 56×
- Olson v. OlsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-01-17· cited 25×
- Hull v. HullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-07-26· cited 12×
- Vanleer v. VanleerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1850-03-15· cited 7×
- McMillin v. McMillinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-10-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.