Nomland v. Nomland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the general preference to have siblings raised together must yield to the paramount principle that the best interests of the child is the determining factor in a custody case
• “So long as the trial court's conclusions are founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”
• “So long as the trial court's conclusions are founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”
• “So long as the trial court’s conclusions are founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”
• “To say that a court cannot discount uncontradicted evidence, however, is merely to rephrase the requirement that a [trial] court’s conclusion have competent evidence to support it.”
• “So long as the trial court's conclusions are - 11 - J-A30006-16 founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).