Nomland v. Nomland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the general preference to have siblings raised together must yield to the paramount principle that the best interests of the child is the determining factor in a custody case
• “So long as the trial court's conclusions are founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”
• “So long as the trial court's conclusions are founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”
• “So long as the trial court’s conclusions are founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”
• “To say that a court cannot discount uncontradicted evidence, however, is merely to rephrase the requirement that a [trial] court’s conclusion have competent evidence to support it.”
• “So long as the trial court's conclusions are - 11 - J-A30006-16 founded in the record, the lower court was not obligated to accept the conclusions of the experts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• M.A.T. v. G.S.T.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-21· cited 159×
• King v. King
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-16· cited 126×
• In the Int. of: T.G., Appeal of: Phila Dept.(DHS)
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-04-22· cited 31×
• Jacob v. Shultz-Jacob
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-30· cited 18×
• Masser v. Miller
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-11· cited 15×
• Mat v. Gst
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-21
• M.B. v. S.S.
  Indiana County Court of Common Pleas· 2007-02-09
• Kline v. Kline
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-06-19
• Flynn v. Bimber
  Erie County Court Common Pleas· 2005-01-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphey v. Hatala
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-06· cited 54×
• Straub v. Tyahla
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-18· cited 40×
• Kaneski v. Kaneski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-16· cited 37×
• Mahoney v. Mahoney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-17· cited 16×
• McAnallen v. McAnallen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-04· cited 16×
• M.D. v. B.D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-14· cited 16×
• Haag v. Haag
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-14· cited 10×
• Hall v. Luick
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-27· cited 7×
• Reefer v. Reefer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-01-18· cited 6×