Killian v. McCulloch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiffs’ PWPCL claim against a Pennsylvania employer because they never resided in and were never based in Pennsylvania
• “[W]e hold that the protections contained in the WPCL extend only to those employees based in Pennsylvania,”
• “[T]he WPCL’s purpose is to offer protection to workers to whom wages are owed.”
• “A literal reading of the statute would, for example, allow an Arizona-based employee to bring a WPCL claim against his Oregon-based employer as long as that company also employed one person based in Pennsylvania.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Keelan v. Bell Communications
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-04-11· cited 39×
• Vengurlekar v. Silverline Technologies, Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 2003-11-24· cited 39×
• Runyon v. Kubota Tractor Corp.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-11-14· cited 35×
• Reilly v. Gould, Inc.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-05-28· cited 17×
• Glass v. Kemper Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 1996-04-01· cited 13×
• Dawson v. JG Wentworth & Co., Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-12-03· cited 6×
• Buche v. Liventa Bioscience, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2015-06-26· cited 4×
• Crites v. Hoogovens Technical Services Inc.
  Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-01-07· cited 3×
• Stadler v. McCulloch
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-04-24· cited 2×
• Williams v. Stone
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-04-16· cited 2×
• Spirou v. Ouly
  Third Circuit· 1996-03-15
• Panchal v. XO Energy Worldwide LLLP
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2025-03-31

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Wanda Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-03-03· cited 312×
• School District of Lancaster v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.
  Third Circuit· 1986-05-01· cited 291×
• Smith v. Jago
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 167×
• Coventry v. United States Steel Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1988-08-26· cited 86×
• Carrier v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-26· cited 74×
• Maynard v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.
  Supreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 64×
• Killian v. McCulloch
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-04-18· cited 38×
• Laborers Combined Funds v. Mattei
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-17· cited 28×
• Lanci v. Metropolitan Insurance
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-28· cited 24×
• Seidman v. American Mobile Systems, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-09-30· cited 23×
• Sendi v. NCR Comten, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-10-25· cited 19×
• Reed v. SmithKline Beckman Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-08-17· cited 16×
• McNasby v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.
  Third Circuit· 1987-10-30· cited 14×
• Price v. Ross
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-08· cited 10×
• Tener v. Hoag
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-10-21· cited 8×
• McNasby v. Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-01-14· cited 7×
• Pennsylvania v. Flaherty
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-09-21· cited 7×
• Loose v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-02-04· cited 6×