Killian v. McCulloch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiffs’ PWPCL claim against a Pennsylvania employer because they never resided in and were never based in Pennsylvania
• “[W]e hold that the protections contained in the WPCL extend only to those employees based in Pennsylvania,”
• “[T]he WPCL’s purpose is to offer protection to workers to whom wages are owed.”
• “A literal reading of the statute would, for example, allow an Arizona-based employee to bring a WPCL claim against his Oregon-based employer as long as that company also employed one person based in Pennsylvania.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).