Supreme Court of Iowa· 11/14/2002

Runyon v. Kubota Tractor Corp.

Citations

653 N.W.2d 582
8 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 471
2002 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 239
2002 WL 31519684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

deeming issue waived when appellant did not state how or where constitutional claim was raised in the trial court
considering whether certain reductions of a bonus to which the plaintiff otherwise would have been entitled pursuant to his compensation package violated the IWPCL
acknowledging a bonus cannot be due “until it can be accurately estimated in accordance with the parties’ agreement”
deeming issue waived where appellant failed to mention how or where a constitutional claim was raised in the district court and the record did not support preservation
“We have observed that the purpose of chapter 91A is to ‘facilitate collection of wages by employees.’ ” (quoting Condon Auto Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Crick, 604 N.W.2d 587, 593 (Iowa 1999))
“[Defendant] rightly notes that in Dallenbach we suggested that a bonus cannot be ‘due’—as that term is used in section 91A.3(1)—until it can be accurately estimated in accordance with the parties' agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neuman, Carter, Ternus, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.