Coventry v. United States Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding contractually guaranteed opportunity to cure would have been futile where party could not have cured its breaches in allotted time period
• applying 20 Arizona law to hold that a party need comply with a contract’s 48-hour notice 21 requirement before canceling because defaulting party had committed a “vital” breach 22 that frustrated the purpose of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).