Wanda Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he ‘typicality’ requirement focuses less on the relative strengths of the named and unnamed plaintiffs’ cases than on the similarity of the legal and remedial theories behind their claims”
• considering whether named plaintiffs have \an insufficient stake in the outcome or interests antagonistic to the unnamed members\ in evaluating adequate representation requirement
• noting that court should also question whether representative has sufficient stake in outcome
• noting that court should also question whether representative has sufficient stake in outcome
• considering, in evaluating adequate representation requirement, whether named plaintiffs have \an insufficient stake in the outcome or interests antagonistic to the unnamed members\
• noting that the threshold for commonality is not high

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).