Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 6/29/2005
Key v. State
Citations
- 173 S.W.3d 72
- 2005 WL 467167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule had been satisfied and, thus, as a matter of law, the victim's statements to police at the scene were nontestimonial
- “initial police-victim interaction at the scene of an incident is not an interrogation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Worthen, Griffith, Devasto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-18· cited 566×
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-08-29· cited 89×
- Purvis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-07· cited 78×
- Spencer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-04-28· cited 74×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-05-19· cited 71×
- State v. MacLinTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 69×
- Marc v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-02· cited 53×
- Hudson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-11-15· cited 50×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-11· cited 44×
- Lagunas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-05-03· cited 40×
- State v. HemberttNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-05-20· cited 37×
- Moore v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-07-26· cited 36×
- Gomez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2005-12-30· cited 22×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-04-15· cited 18×
- Mims v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-10-24· cited 11×
- Arroyo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2007-11-14· cited 8×
- Mason v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-06-30· cited 2×
- State of Tennessee v. Larrie Maclin AND State of Tennessee v. Michael Lebron AndersonTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-01-18
- Victor Lamont Mims v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-10-24
- Elysee Marc v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-02
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Lagrone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-05· cited 911×
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 598×
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 195×
- Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-20· cited 142×
- People v. CorellaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-09-16· cited 95×
- People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-03-25· cited 83×
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 74×
- Muttoni v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-07-27· cited 70×
- Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-09· cited 68×
- Metts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-07-26· cited 58×
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-14· cited 57×
- Fowler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-14· cited 43×
- Gonzalez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-12-15· cited 43×
- Stancil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-01-27· cited 25×
- People v. MackeyCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-10-05· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.