Skip to main content

Key v. State

Citations

  • 173 S.W.3d 72
  • 2005 WL 467167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule had been satisfied and, thus, as a matter of law, the victim's statements to police at the scene were nontestimonial
  • “initial police-victim interaction at the scene of an incident is not an interrogation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worthen, Griffith, Devasto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.