Court of Appeals of Alaska· 4/15/2005
Anderson v. State
Citations
- 111 P.3d 350
- 2005 Alas. App. LEXIS 40
- 2005 WL 858773
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an assault victim's statement to police at the scene of the crime was nontestimonial
- finding that statement was excited utterance makes it “inconsistent” with Crawford formulation of “testimonial”
- consulting dictionaries for the “colloquial” meaning of “interrogation,” noting that the American Heritage Dictionary 4th ed.2000, defines “interrogate” as “to examine by questioning formally or officially,” and that Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Law (1996 ed.
- “excited re- spouses to brief on-the-scene questioning by police officers” not “testimonial”
- excited utterances by a crime victim to a police officer are not testimonial
- “interrogation” refers to “category of formal, official, and systematic questioning”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Jerome HadleySixth Circuit· 2005-12-06· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-08-29· cited 89×
- State v. MacLinTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 69×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-06· cited 50×
- State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-08-04· cited 28×
- Flores v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-09-06· cited 14×
- Contreras v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-14· cited 12×
- State v. OhlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-28· cited 7×
- Bartee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-17· cited 4×
- State v. WarsameCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-08-09· cited 4×
- State of Tennessee v. Larrie Maclin AND State of Tennessee v. Michael Lebron AndersonTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-01-18
- Ex Parte: Robert Rory Hohn TDCJ No. 755274Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-05-28
- Jimmy Lee Flores v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-09-06
- United States v. HadleySixth Circuit· 2005-12-06
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- People v. MoscatCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-03-25· cited 83×
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 74×
- Leavitt v. AraveNinth Circuit· 2004-06-14· cited 45×
- Fowler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-14· cited 43×
- Urshan v. Musicians' Credit UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-07-14· cited 37×
- Key v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2005-06-29· cited 32×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-08-10· cited 31×
- State v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-02· cited 28×
- Stancil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-01-27· cited 25×
- People v. MackeyCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-10-05· cited 25×
- In Re EHAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-01-28· cited 20×
- State v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court· 2002-09-26· cited 16×
- State v. OrndorffCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-03· cited 16×
- Dezarn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-05-29· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.