Indiana Court of Appeals· 6/14/2004
Fowler v. State
Citations
- 809 N.E.2d 960
- 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1103
- 2004 WL 1302657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- victim’s statements made to police immediately after incident not testimonial because not given in formal setting or contained within formalized document of any land
- the very nature of the declarant’s excited utterance places it outside the realm of testimonial statements
- Statements by victim of domestic violence, made to officer dispatched to scene, deemed nontestimonial.
- Statements by victim of domestic violence, made to officer dispatched to scene, deemed nontestimonial.
- “An unrehearsed statement made without reflection or deliberation, as required to be an ‘excited utterance,’ is not ‘testimonial’ in that such a statement, by definition, has not been made in contemplation of its use in a future trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes, Mathias, Crone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 74×
- Spencer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-04-28· cited 74×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-05-19· cited 71×
- People v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-06-30· cited 69×
- Fowler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 68×
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-06-21· cited 47×
- Lagunas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-05-03· cited 40×
- Moore v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-07-26· cited 36×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-09-03· cited 34×
- Key v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2005-06-29· cited 32×
- State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 25×
- Stancil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-01-27· cited 25×
- Napier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-06· cited 25×
- People v. MackeyCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-10-05· cited 25×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-28· cited 24×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-04-15· cited 18×
- Drayton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-06-16· cited 16×
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-03-03· cited 8×
- People v. KingColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-01-27· cited 8×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-19· cited 65×
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-06-14· cited 57×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-02-07· cited 49×
- Hardiman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-04-14· cited 36×
- Gordon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-02-28· cited 15×
- Kielblock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-18· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.