Skip to main content

Fowler v. State

Citations

  • 809 N.E.2d 960
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1103
  • 2004 WL 1302657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • victim’s statements made to police immediately after incident not testimonial because not given in formal setting or contained within formalized document of any land
  • the very nature of the declarant’s excited utterance places it outside the realm of testimonial statements
  • Statements by victim of domestic violence, made to officer dispatched to scene, deemed nontestimonial.
  • Statements by victim of domestic violence, made to officer dispatched to scene, deemed nontestimonial.
  • “An unrehearsed statement made without reflection or deliberation, as required to be an ‘excited utterance,’ is not ‘testimonial’ in that such a statement, by definition, has not been made in contemplation of its use in a future trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Mathias, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.