Muttoni v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the improper admission of hearsay violates an accused’s constitutional right to confront and examine witnesses
• holding that the improper admission of hearsay violates an accused’s constitutional right to confront and examine witnesses
• holding that the improper admission of hearsay violates an accused's constitutional right to confront and examine witnesses
• applying abuse-of-discretion standard of review to case in which right to present complete defense was implicated
• applying abuse-of-discretion standard of review to case in which right to present complete defense was implicated
• although State offered documentary circumstantial evidence of defendant’s participation in theft, only non-testifying cohort’s statement implicated defendant through “eye-witness evidence,” causing unchallenged accusation to be more persuasive than records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).