Katherine M. v. Ryder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims in federal court was irrelevant to the determination of a section 2-619(a)(3) dismissal
• that the plaintiffs were unable to assert state law claims in federal court was irrelevant
• the fact that the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims in federal court was irrelevant to the determination of a section 2 — 619(a)(3) dismissal
• the fact that the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims in federal court was irrelevant to the determination of a section 2-619(a)(3) dismissal
• trial court abused its discretion by not granting motion to dismiss
• where, because of doctrine preventing plaintiffs from bringing pendent state law claims against state officers in federal courts, the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims, appellate court found that fact irrelevant to the determination of the section 2 — 619(a)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).