Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/14/1993

Katherine M. v. Ryder

Citations

627 N.E.2d 42
254 Ill. App. 3d 479
193 Ill. Dec. 883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

the fact that the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims in federal court was irrelevant to the determination of a section 2-619(a)(3) dismissal
that the plaintiffs were unable to assert state law claims in federal court was irrelevant
the fact that the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims in federal court was irrelevant to the determination of a section 2 — 619(a)(3) dismissal
the fact that the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims in federal court was irrelevant to the determination of a section 2-619(a)(3) dismissal
trial court abused its discretion by not granting motion to dismiss
where, because of doctrine preventing plaintiffs from bringing pendent state law claims against state officers in federal courts, the plaintiffs were unable to assert their state law claims, appellate court found that fact irrelevant to the determination of the section 2 — 619(a)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiVITO

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.