Jackson v. Callan Publishing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the split and stating \(t]he modem view generally recognizes that a valid consent judgment is entitled to a res judicata effect\)
• explaining the split in authority, and comparing SDS Partners, Inc. v. Cramer, 305 Ill. App. 3d 893, 896 (1999) (order is final) with Kandalepas v. Economou, 269 Ill. App. 3d 245, 252 (1994) (order is not final)
• a case is moot when it does not involve any actual controversy or where the issues involved in the trial court have ceased to exist
• a case is moot when it does not involve any actual controversy or where the issues involved in the trial court have ceased to exist
• a section 2 — 615 motion to dismiss attacks the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s complaint by alleging defects appearing on the complaint’s face; such a motion does not raise affirmative factual defenses
• a section 2-615 motion to dismiss attacks the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's complaint by alleging defects appearing on the complaint's face; such a motion does not raise affirmative factual defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).