Skip to main content
· 7/7/1995

Schnitzer v. O'CONNOR

Citations

  • 653 N.E.2d 825
  • 210 Ill. Dec. 630
  • 274 Ill. App. 3d 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that demand rule 7.80(b) is \al most identical\ to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.1
  • stating that demand rule 7.80(b) is “almost identical” to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1
  • stating that demand rule 7.80(b) is “almost identical” to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.1
  • “whether demand is made or proven futile is merely a prerequisite to a derivative action under Illinois’ demand statute”
  • plaintiffs in shareholder derivative action had same interest as separate group of plaintiff shareholders, i.e., recovery to the corporation and its shareholders for the defendant directors’ breach of their duties
  • plaintiffs in shareholder derivative action had same interest as separate group of plaintiff shareholders, i.e., recovery to the corporation and its shareholders for the defendant directors= breach of their duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.