Skip to main content

Miller v. Thomas

Citations

  • 656 N.E.2d 89
  • 211 Ill. Dec. 897
  • 275 Ill. App. 3d 779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that the plaintiffs in that case could not ask for a reversal on the basis that they needed additional discovery to oppose the motion to dismiss because the plaintiffs failed to use the Rule 191(b) procedure to address their discovery needs
  • shareholder should not undermine a corporate board’s decision and file derivative suit simply because the corporate board chooses not to sue
  • business judgment rule applied to board of director’s refusal of shareholder demand to bring a lawsuit against certain present and former directors of the corporation
  • shareholder should not undermine a corporate board's decision and file derivative suit simply because the corporate board chooses not to sue
  • business judgment rule applied to board of director's refusal of shareholder demand to bring a lawsuit against certain present and former directors of the corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.