Hapag-Lloyd (America), Inc. v. Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• underlying claimants have a substantial interest in how insurance questions are resolved
• underlying claimants have a substantial interest in how insurance questions are resolved
• “Another discretionary factor that should have been taken into account was whether the Federal Action could provide complete relief to all of the parties”
• \Another discretionary factor that should have been taken into account was whether the Federal Action could provide complete relief to all of the parties\
• \Another discretionary factor that should have been taken into account was whether the Federal Action could provide complete relief to all of the parties\
• “Even assuming that the same party and same cause requirements had been met, section 2- 619(a)(3) does not mandate automatic dismissal or stay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).