Morgan v. Department of Financial & Professional Regulation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• complaining witness E.S. testified that she and her husband were referred to plaintiff for marriage counseling
• “we may not substitute our judgment for that of the administrative agency, but must ascertain whether the findings and decisions of the agency are against the manifest weight of the evidence”
• where this appellate court determined that the State violated a clinical psychologist’s right to due process when the State took 15 months to decide the case after the issuance of suspension
• where this appellate court determined that the State violated a clinical psychologist's right to due process when the State took 15 months to decide the case after the issuance of suspension
• where this appellate court determined that the State violated a clinical psychologist's right to due process when the State took 15 months to decide the case after the issuance of suspension
• “we may not substitute our judgment -18- 1-06-1694 for that of the administrative agency, but must ascertain whether the findings and decisions of the agency are against the manifest weight of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).