Skip to main content
· 11/7/2008

Andonissamy v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

Citations

  • 547 F.3d 841
  • 14 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 328
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 23711
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,375
  • 104 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1253
  • 2008 WL 4821742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[a] statute of limitations defense, while not normally part of a motion under Rule 12(b)(6
  • “directing work activities and recommending disciplinary action are not in and of themselves sufficient to make someone a supervisor under Title VII.”
  • “A statute of limitations defense, while not normally part of a motion under Rule 12(b)(6
  • “Under Title VII, an employer can be vicariously liable for a hostile work environment created by a supervisor[.]”
  • dismissal is appropriate when “a complaint plainly reveals that an action is untimely under the governing statute of limitations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Williams, Sykes, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.