Skip to main content
· 7/16/2009

Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 572 F.3d 440
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15633
  • 2009 WL 2046399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \a factual challenge lies where the complaint is formally sufficient but the contention is that there is in fact no subject matter jurisdiction\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining that \a factual challenge lies where the complaint is formally sufficient but the contention is that there is in fact no subject matter jurisdiction\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding that standing is a jurisdictional requirement
  • holding that standing is a jurisdictional requirement
  • holding that standing is a jurisdictional requirement
  • describing that a complaint may fail to plead subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.