· 7/16/2009
Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Citations
- 572 F.3d 440
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15633
- 2009 WL 2046399
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that \a factual challenge lies where the complaint is formally sufficient but the contention is that there is in fact no subject matter jurisdiction\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- explaining that \a factual challenge lies where the complaint is formally sufficient but the contention is that there is in fact no subject matter jurisdiction\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- holding that standing is a jurisdictional requirement
- holding that standing is a jurisdictional requirement
- holding that standing is a jurisdictional requirement
- describing that a complaint may fail to plead subject-matter jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.