Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence which can reasonably be construed in two different and opposing ways is not evidence of anything
• holding that evidence which can reasonably be construed in two different and opposing ways is not evidence of anything
• holding that evidence which can reasonably be construed in two different and opposing ways is not evidence of anything
• holding that evidence which can reasonably be construed in two different and opposing ways is not evidence of anything
• holding that “meager circumstantial evidence” that could give rise to any number of inferences, none more probable than another, is no evidence of an ultimate fact issue
• holding that A meager circumstantial evidence @ that could give rise to any number of inferences, none more probable than another, is no evidence of an ultimate fact issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).