Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the right to privacy should be balanced against the public interest in the information
• recognizing that the right to privacy should be balanced against the public interest in the information
• stating that a false light cause of action could be based on the publication of true facts that create a false impression
• finding that although actions for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy compensate similar damages, there is no reason to refuse to recognize both torts
• finding that although actions for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy compensate similar damages, there is no reason to refuse to recognize both torts
• recognizing the false light invasion of privacy definition in Restatement section 652E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).