Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 920 A.2d 1
  • 173 Md. App. 430
  • 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hearkening the verdict is required in the absence of a request for polling, noting further that “polling is a fully commensurable substitute for hearkening” (citation omitted)
  • noting that “[o]nce jurors are discharged and dispersed, they no longer constitute a jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Krauser, Sharer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.