Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 866 A.2d 151
  • 384 Md. 669
  • 2005 Md. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence is illegal if based upon a verdict of guilty in a jury trial that was not orally announced in court
  • holding that a sentence is illegal if based upon a verdict of guilty in a jury trial that was not orally announced in court
  • holding that, although three of the defendant’s convictions and sentences were proper, the sentence on one charge was illegal under Rule 4-345(a)
  • claiming that there was no conviction on which sentence could legally be imposed because the verdict was never announced orally and, therefore, never became final
  • discussing that the “ ‘return’ of a verdict” is “comprised of three distinct procedures, each fulfilling a specific purpose,” namely (1) the foreperson’s answering the inquiry of the clerk and stating the jury’s verdict to the court; (2
  • alleging an illegal sentence because the verdict was not announced orally in open court so as to allow the jury to be polled and hearkened to the verdict, and thus violated Maryland Rule 4-327

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.