Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/4/2005
Caldwell v. State
Citations
- 884 A.2d 199
- 164 Md. App. 612
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the clerk must correct the docket entries to reflect the not guilty verdict reflected in the transcript
- holding that the clerk must correct the docket entries to reflect the not guilty verdict reflected in the transcript
- “The concept of unanimity ... embraces not only numerical completeness but also completeness of assent, i.e., each juror making his or her decision freely and voluntarily, without being swayed or tainted by outside influences.”
- “The concept of unanimity ... embraces not only numerical completeness but also completeness of assent, i.e., each juror making his or her decision freely and voluntarily, without being swayed or tainted by outside influences.”
- “A case is removed from the province of the jury when the jury is hearkened to its verdict and the verdict is accepted by the court; or when the jury is polled, and the verdict as polled is accepted by the court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander, Eyler, Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States of America v Strickland - OpinionNinth Circuit· 2010-04-19· cited 46×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-29· cited 14×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-13· cited 14×
- Malarkey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-02· cited 13×
- State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-17· cited 13×
- Alford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-22· cited 8×
- Wardlaw v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-08· cited 6×
- Davis v. ArmacostCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-09-01· cited 5×
- Warne v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-05· cited 4×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-10· cited 4×
- Simms v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-05-01· cited 2×
- Claybourne v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-02-28· cited 2×
- Browne v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-06· cited 2×
- Colvin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-30· cited 1×
- Turner v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-25
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-27
- Bromberg v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-05-30
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court· 1949-04-25· cited 1,511×
- United States v. BallSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 1,080×
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 853×
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 557×
- Andres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-04-26· cited 356×
- Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 255×
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-23· cited 168×
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-15· cited 132×
- United States v. Anthony Dilapi and Benjamin LadmerSecond Circuit· 1981-06-09· cited 99×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-01-07· cited 99×
- Pugh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-05-30· cited 84×
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1878-06-27· cited 83×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.