Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 158 A.3d 1005
  • 452 Md. 702
  • 2017 WL 1490991
  • 2017 Md. LEXIS 321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “the trial judge acted outside of Rule 4-324, which is not a mere procedural irregularity but a dispossession of authority”
  • noting that, in the absence of express authorization, the trial court is not permitted to reserve ruling on a motion for directed verdict
  • stating that “only when the court has the authority to act does an acquittal implicate double jeopardy” and the trial “judge was without authority to acquit after he failed to adhere to Rule 4-324”
  • “only when the court has the authority to act does an acquittal implicate double jeopardy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.