Skip to main content

Rainey v. State

Citations

  • 182 A.3d 184
  • 236 Md. App. 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although docket entries are entitled to a presumption of regularity, and must be taken as true until corrected, they are not sacrosanct, and the presumption may be rebutted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.