Skip to main content

Baker v. State

Citations

  • 883 A.2d 916
  • 389 Md. 127
  • 2005 Md. LEXIS 586
  • 2005 WL 2412898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence is inherently illegal if \the sentence never should have been imposed[ ]\
  • holding that a Rule 4-345(a) motion is proper if “the sentence never should have been imposed”
  • holding that a sentence is inherently illegal if “the sentence never should have been imposed[]”
  • recognizing in a capital sentencing that an error premised on a novel constitutional question decided after imposition of a capital sentence may be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence
  • recognizing in a capital sentencing that an error premised on a novel constitutional question decided after imposition of a capital sentence may be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence
  • “[A] motion to correct an illegal sentence” is “ ‘entertained ... where ... the sentence never should have been imposed’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.