Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/3/2005
Baker v. State
Citations
- 883 A.2d 916
- 389 Md. 127
- 2005 Md. LEXIS 586
- 2005 WL 2412898
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a sentence is inherently illegal if \the sentence never should have been imposed[ ]\
- holding that a Rule 4-345(a) motion is proper if “the sentence never should have been imposed”
- holding that a sentence is inherently illegal if “the sentence never should have been imposed[]”
- recognizing in a capital sentencing that an error premised on a novel constitutional question decided after imposition of a capital sentence may be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence
- recognizing in a capital sentencing that an error premised on a novel constitutional question decided after imposition of a capital sentence may be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence
- “[A] motion to correct an illegal sentence” is “ ‘entertained ... where ... the sentence never should have been imposed’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-12-19· cited 93×
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-09· cited 47×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-10· cited 32×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-07-10· cited 27×
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-11· cited 24×
- Carlini v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-18· cited 22×
- Tshiwala v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-01-23· cited 21×
- Alston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-23· cited 21×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-01-05· cited 18×
- Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-15· cited 15×
- Ray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-29· cited 5×
- Bratt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-28· cited 3×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 2,038×
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 525×
- Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-06· cited 122×
- Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-07· cited 106×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-10· cited 82×
- Roberts v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-02-10· cited 81×
- Maryland v. KanarasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-20· cited 59×
- State v. GriffithsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-16· cited 54×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-20· cited 44×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-23· cited 43×
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-17· cited 43×
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArterySupreme Court· 1890-12-22· cited 42×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-12· cited 33×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-07· cited 32×
- Riddlespriger v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court· 2004-03-22· cited 24×
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-14· cited 13×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-10-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.