Skip to main content

Jimenez v. State

Citations

  • 918 P.2d 687
  • 112 Nev. 610
  • 1996 Nev. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecution had duty to disclose benefits given to witness even though at the time witness agreed to testify no benefits had been given
  • holding that prosecution had duty to disclose benefits given to witness even though at the time witness agreed to testify no benefits had been given
  • concluding that prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), may result from cumulative deficiencies in counsel's performance
  • concluding that prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), may result from cumulative deficiencies in counsel’s perform anee
  • noting that when there is a specific request for evidence, materiality is satisfied if there is a reasonable possibility that the omitted evidence would have affected the outcome of trial
  • applying similar analysis to claim that trial court erred in failing to instruct jury that mitigating circumstances did not have to be found unanimously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.