Skip to main content

Jones v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 382 S.W.3d 22
  • 2011 WL 6543010
  • 2011 Ky. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the statement made in Cummings v. Commonwealth, 226 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Ky. 2007
  • explaining that the statement made in Cummings v. Commonwealth, 226 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Ky. 2007
  • “Appellant’s argument that the imposition of restitution in excess of the $100,000.00 violated KRS 533.030(3) is a true ‘sentencing issue’ and we review it despite the lack of preservation.”
  • distinguishing between arguments involving violations of statutes and procedural defects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.