Cummings v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the attorney’s discussion with the judge about facts to be proved is not evidence
• holding that the attorney's discussion with the judge about facts to be proved is not evidence
• holding that the attorney’s discussion with the judge about facts to be proved is not evidence
• “[J]eopardy attaches . . . after a jury is empaneled and sworn in a jury trial . . . .” (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 242 Va. 1, 8 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).