Skip to main content

Chaney v. State

Citations

  • 918 A.2d 506
  • 397 Md. 460
  • 2007 Md. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that probation conditions were permissible and not inherently illegal; therefore, a challenge to the condition could be waived
  • explaining that appellate courts should “rarely exercise” their discretion to review unpreserved issues under Md. Rule 8-131(a
  • noting that collateral and belated review under Md. Rule 4-345(a) is permitted for illegal sentences
  • explaining that appellate courts should “rarely exercise” their discretion to review unpreserved issues under Md. Rule 8-131(a
  • noting that collateral and belated review under Md. Rule 4-345(a) is permitted for illegal sentences
  • stating that an inherent illegality means that “there either has been no conviction warranting any sentence for the particular offense or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.