Skip to main content

Bailey v. State

Citations

  • 160 S.W.3d 11
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 516
  • 2004 WL 574639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pointing out that the sentence was not complete until the date of the restitution hearing
  • finding jurisdiction to review an order adding payment of restitution as a condition of community supervision because the “[a]ppellant could not have appealed a decision granting restitution [when] there was no restitution award to appeal”
  • finding jurisdiction to review an order adding payment of restitution as a condition of community supervision because the “[a]ppellant could not have appealed a decision granting restitution [when] there was no restitution award to appeal”
  • reiterating 30-day filing requirement in absence of motion for new trial
  • reiterating 30-day filing requirement in absence of motion for new trial
  • “[appellant] could not have appealed a decision granting restitution because there was no restitution award to appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Price, Johnson, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Womack, Hervey, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.