Com. of Ky. v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the DUI service fee was not a fine
• “The interpretation of statutes is a matter of law which we review de novo.”
• interpretation of statutes subject to de novo review
• interpretation of statutes subject to de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bowling v. Commonwealth
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-08-16· cited 16×
• A.F. v. L.B.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2019-03-01· cited 11×
• Fultz v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2018-08-03· cited 1×
• Perry Lee Penning v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-01-30
• Perry Lee Penning v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-03-10
• Cole v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2019-04-05
• Tyler Story v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2024-12-19
• Troy Dunkleberger v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2025-03-20
• Board of Education of Paris, Kentucky v. Jason Earlywine
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2025-03-20
• Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Russell T. Amboree
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2026-02-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hoskins v. Maricle
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-12-16· cited 335×
• McClanahan v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2010-04-22· cited 77×
• Jones v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2011-12-22· cited 61×
• Hampton v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1984-03-08· cited 44×
• Beane v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 4×