Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 9/19/2014

Jonathan Corbett v. Transportation Security Administration

Citations

  • 767 F.3d 1171
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17971
  • 2014 WL 4654479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that 60-day deadline to petition for review of Transportation Se- curity Administration decision was not jurisdictional
  • rejecting a petitioner’s request for sensitive security information because the TSA “determined” disclosure would be “detrimental to the security of transportation”
  • rejecting a petitioner’s request for sensitive security information because the TSA “determined” disclosure would be “detrimental to the security of transportation”
  • finding 60-day statutory requirement to file a petition after an order is issued “does not suggest Congress intended the deadline to have jurisdictional consequences”
  • rejecting a petitioner’s request for sensitive security information because the TSA “determined” disclosure would be “detrimental to the security of transportation”
  • finding 60-day statutory requirement to file a petition after an order is issued “does not suggest Congress intended the deadline to have jurisdictional consequences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Pryor, Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.