Eleventh Circuit· 9/19/2014
Jonathan Corbett v. Transportation Security Administration
Citations
- 767 F.3d 1171
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17971
- 2014 WL 4654479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that 60-day deadline to petition for review of Transportation Se- curity Administration decision was not jurisdictional
- rejecting a petitioner’s request for sensitive security information because the TSA “determined” disclosure would be “detrimental to the security of transportation”
- rejecting a petitioner’s request for sensitive security information because the TSA “determined” disclosure would be “detrimental to the security of transportation”
- finding 60-day statutory requirement to file a petition after an order is issued “does not suggest Congress intended the deadline to have jurisdictional consequences”
- rejecting a petitioner’s request for sensitive security information because the TSA “determined” disclosure would be “detrimental to the security of transportation”
- finding 60-day statutory requirement to file a petition after an order is issued “does not suggest Congress intended the deadline to have jurisdictional consequences”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marcus, Pryor, Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mocek v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2015-12-22· cited 175×
- Jonathan Corbett v. Transportation Security AdministrationEleventh Circuit· 2019-07-19· cited 44×
- Ruskai v. PistoleFirst Circuit· 2014-12-23· cited 31×
- Jonathan Albert Leal v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-11-13· cited 17×
- National Federation of the Blind v. United States Department of TransportationD.C. Circuit· 2016-06-28· cited 17×
- Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust Ex Rel. Cinnabar Service Co. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationTenth Circuit· 2016-10-14· cited 4×
- DAY v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-06-04· cited 2×
- McWhorter v. FAATenth Circuit· 2023-12-20· cited 2×
- Leal, Jonathan AlbertCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-07
- Elisabeth Koletas v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2025-11-12
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 6,493×
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 2,910×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court· 2004-01-14· cited 1,543×
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court· 2011-03-01· cited 1,451×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 752×
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court· 2010-03-02· cited 744×
- Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court· 2013-01-22· cited 544×
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court· 1997-04-15· cited 524×
- United States v. KaleyEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 268×
- City of Ontario v. QuonSupreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 233×
- Mohamed Ali Abdi v. U. S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2005-11-15· cited 191×
- Maharaj v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2005-12-15· cited 184×
- United States v. CampaEleventh Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 152×
- United States v. Henry BellSecond Circuit· 1972-07-05· cited 140×
- Joseph Carl Shaw v. Joseph R. Martin, Warden, Central Correctional Institution, and Hon. Daniel R. McLeod Attorney General for South CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1984-04-26· cited 118×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.