Eleventh Circuit· 8/18/2009

United States v. Kaley

Citations

579 F.3d 1246
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18430
2009 WL 2497599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a prior panel’s interpretation remains binding unless a later Supreme Court decision is \clearly on point\
holding that a prior panel’s interpretation remains binding unless a later Supreme Court decision is “clearly on point”
holding that a Supreme Court decision must be clearly on point and “actually abrogate or directly conflict with” this Court’s decision to overrule precedent under the prior-prece- dent rule
holding that we “may disregard the holding of a prior opinion only where that holding is overruled by the Court sitting en banc or by the Supreme Court” (internal quotation marks omitted)
holding that this Court’s precedent is binding under the prior panel precedent rule unless it is contradicted by a “clearly on point” decision from either the Supreme Court or this Court sitting en banc
explaining that for a subsequent Supreme Court opinion to abrogate our prior precedent, it must \directly conflict with\ that prior precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Marcus, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Kaley

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.