Ruskai v. Pistole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have sometimes acknowledged . . . factual submissions, . . . at least where they raise a question of mootness.”
• “[U]npleasant effects . . . neither connected to any denial of access nor motivated by discriminatory intent” are “outside” disability discrimination law’s “target”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).