Skip to main content

Johnson v. Veneman

Citations

  • 815 F. Supp. 2d 221
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The [LLFPA] does not revive any of plaintiff’s claims of discrimination based on the failure to grant plaintiff timely promotions as soon as [s]he was eligible for them.”
  • “These assertions do not suffice to rebut defendant’s legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation, not only because they are unsupported by the evidence, but'also because they fail to assert that any action was taken based on plaintiffs [protected class].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Emmet G. Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.