· 11/16/2001
Forman, Paul v. Small, Lawrence M.
Citations
- 271 F.3d 285
- 350 U.S. App. D.C. 24
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24554
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,826
- 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 526
- 2001 WL 1435532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that section 15 of ADEA \by its own terms alone prohibits\ retaliation as one form of age discrimination
- ruling that § 633a waives sovereign immunity as to claims of retaliation, not just claims of age discrimination
- concluding that, although an employer “knew of the [plaintiff’s] EEO complaint” when he decided not to promote the plaintiff, the plaintiff had still not pointed to sufficient evidence such that a reasonable jury could infer causation
- explaining that the plaintiff “merely needs to establish facts adequate to permit an inference of retaliatory motive”
- requiring that, for a prima facie case of retaliation, plaintiff show a causal connection existed between a protected activity and the adverse action
- stating that knowledge, without more, will not establish causation for a prima facie case of retaliation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.