Skip to main content
· 11/16/2001

Forman, Paul v. Small, Lawrence M.

Citations

  • 271 F.3d 285
  • 350 U.S. App. D.C. 24
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24554
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,826
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 526
  • 2001 WL 1435532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 15 of ADEA \by its own terms alone prohibits\ retaliation as one form of age discrimination
  • ruling that § 633a waives sovereign immunity as to claims of retaliation, not just claims of age discrimination
  • concluding that, although an employer “knew of the [plaintiff’s] EEO complaint” when he decided not to promote the plaintiff, the plaintiff had still not pointed to sufficient evidence such that a reasonable jury could infer causation
  • explaining that the plaintiff “merely needs to establish facts adequate to permit an inference of retaliatory motive”
  • requiring that, for a prima facie case of retaliation, plaintiff show a causal connection existed between a protected activity and the adverse action
  • stating that knowledge, without more, will not establish causation for a prima facie case of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.