Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 885 S.E.2d 725
  • 315 Ga. 876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a pro se filing by a counseled defendant is not per se a legal nullity and that “a court has the discretion to recognize a timely and otherwise procedurally 4 proper pro se filing made by a defendant who is still formally represented by counsel”
  • overturning precedent that pro se filings from represented individuals were legal nullities and holding that trial courts had the discretion to accept such filings
  • discussing the limited circumstances in which a criminal defendant is authorized to file pro se pleadings while represented by counsel
  • overruling prior decisions “to the extent that they hold that pro se filings by counseled defendants are 1 See Johnson v. State, 315 Ga. 876, 890-891 (4) & n. 15 (885 SE2d 725) (2023
  • stare decisis did not require retaining a decision that was “unreasoned (bordering on accidental)” and “in conflict with our own decisions”
  • trial court has discretion to consider pro se motion filed while defendant is still represented by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.